Back to News
Security News

SDNY Rejects Insurer’s Attempt to Stretch D&O Policy’s “Subsequent Acts” Exclusion

UnknownMar 19, 2026(about 2 hours ago)

The Southern District of New York rejected an insurer's attempt to stretch a "Subsequent Acts" exclusion in an insurance policy.

In a recent decision from the Southern District of New York, Judge Jed S. Rakoff rejected an insurer’s attempt to stretch a “Subsequent Acts” exclusion beyond its text and denied a motion to dismiss a policyholder’s coverage action. The decision in AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. v. Forge Underwriting Ltd. underscores a familiar but critical point in New York insurance law: exclusions are strictly construed, and insurers bear a heavy burden when they attempt to defeat coverage at the pleading... By: Pillsbury - Policyholder Pulse blog

Related News

Get Personalized Alerts

Track vendors and receive alerts when security incidents affect your supply chain.

What We Monitor

Security Incidents

Data breaches, ransomware, and unauthorized access

Vulnerabilities

CVEs and vendor security advisories

Compliance Updates

Regulatory changes and certification news

Legal News

Privacy laws and enforcement actions

Vendor Directory

Browse our directory of SaaS vendors with security documentation and compliance information.