When Advocacy and Ethics Collide: Two Recent North Carolina Decisions on Attorney Disqualification
When Advocacy and Ethics Collide: Two Recent North Carolina Decisions on Attorney Disqualification
Two recent North Carolina decisions, Sloan‑Oudeh v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (N.C. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2026) and WP Church, LLC v. Whalen (2026 NCBC Order 10) offer timely and instructive guidance on attorney disqualification, underscoring the judiciary’s increasing willingness to enforce ethical boundaries even when doing so disrupts ongoing litigation. Although arising in different contexts, both cases emphasize that courts will closely scrutinize counsel’s role when representation... By: Cranfill Sumner LLP
Related News
M-Trends 2026: Initial Access Handoff Shrinks From Hours to 22 Seconds
Unknown30 minutes ago
Building Fairness: The Public Policy Behind Oregon’s Lien Law
Unknownabout 1 hour ago
Privacy Goes to the Top Court: The Supreme Court of Canada to Hear the Facebook-OPC Case in March 2026
Unknownabout 1 hour ago