Ninth Circuit Clarifies the Role of Ambiguity in Applying the Reasonable Consumer Standard in Class Actions
Ninth Circuit Clarifies the Role of Ambiguity in Applying the Reasonable Consumer Standard in Class Actions
In Panelli v. Target Corp., No. 24-6640, (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026), the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court’s dismissal of a putative class action alleging that the sale of 100% cotton bedsheets with claimed thread counts of 600 or greater violated California’s consumer protection statutes. The plaintiff alleged that testing showed that the advertised 800-count bedsheets he purchased had a thread count of 288 and that it is physically impossible to achieve greater than 600 thread... By: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Related News
The Isaac Accords: Argentina’s new strategic framework with Israel
Unknownabout 1 hour ago
FAR Council Releases EO 14398 Implementation Guidance: Key Implications for Federal Contractor DEI Programs
Unknownabout 1 hour ago
Joint Employment Reframed: DOL’s Proposed Rule Would Unify FLSA, FMLA, and MSPA Standards
Unknownabout 1 hour ago