House v. NCAA: Could a New Court Motion Make the $20.5M Cap Irrelevant?

A new court motion in House v. NCAA could significantly reshape the future of college sports by weakening one of the main enforcement mechanisms tied to the landmark settlement. While the original agreement drew attention for its $2.8 billion back-pay award and its authorization for schools to share up to $20.5 million annually with athletes, the latest dispute centers on a narrower but important question: should certain outside payments even count toward those limits?... By: Lowndes